On 10/09/13 15:18, Matúš Kukan wrote: > On 10 September 2013 09:13, Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>> Nitpick: dev-install tweaks bootstraprc, so UserInstallation points to >> $SYSUSERCONFIG/libreoffice/4, not $SYSUSERCONFIG/libreofficedev/4 as >> instdir currently has it. Is this intentional? > > No such change is intentional. > It should produce the same directory structure modulo some missing > files. (or some which should not be there) > > It should be the same as PRODUCTNAME, --enable-dbgutil has 'dev' suffix. > Are you sure both files are generated with the same autogen parameters ? actually i noticed that configure.ac always set PRODUCTNAME to LibreOffice and changed it to LibreOfficeDev for --enable-dbgutil like it used to be in instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst.in; this changed not only the README etc. files that were touched in the branch, but also other pre-existing uses like the above config dir, which i suspect were wrong. unless of course there is some consensus that using a different name for dbgutil builds is silly and should be removed. i don't actually care either way. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
