On 10/10/13 09:14, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/09/2013 10:58 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> I don't know why it is used for Mac, as there are no individual >> packages, but I assume that's scp2 heritage. > > ....which brings me back to my original question for a universal trigger > whether or not to produce installation sets during a build. > > Seeing that --enable-epm currently effectively fulfills that role > everywhere but on Windows, one option would be to make it fulfill that > role on Windows too. (I have a local patch to do that.) > > The alternative would be to introduce an explicit > --enable-installation-sets. Opinions, anyone? we already have --with-package-format, much simpler to do nothing if the user doesn't specify that than adding another option, or using --enable-epm on a plaform where EPM is irrelevant. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice