Hi Caolán, On Thursday, 2013-11-28 16:02:06 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Do we want to return -1 or SAL_MAX_INT32 as the > replacement. -1 is "nice" but there is so much code in existence that > expects the error/boundary condition return value to be > any valid > number that I reckon SAL_MAX_INT32 might be safer as the default. I'd rather like to see a value (SAL_MAX_INT32-1) as replacement and name it SAL_MAX_STRING or some such. Reason is there are/were places that loop until <= STRING_MAXLEN and if the string really was that long looped forever because it wrapped around 0xffff ... I'd like to avoid situations where such could happen again and SAL_MAX_STRING+1 actually is a value within the bounds of the type. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key ID: 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A Support the FSFE, care about Free Software! https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
pgpL3idvbs8w5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
