On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:44 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > ** when compiling .cxx files for which it is known that the constructor > > function for some S will be visible (which could e.g. be ~always the > > case when compiling for a single big executable on Android/iOS), define > > the LO_URE_CTOR_ENV_<S'> and LO_URE_CTOR_FUN_<S'> macros, either via -D > > or via some strategically included header > > Yes, so this needs some thought. > If I see correctly, there are already some typos in > 15abebbde560e17413f17b16b8b2e9c1f31f01a5 > like LO_URE_CTOR_FUN_com_dot_sun_dot_star_dot_xml_dot_sax_dot_FastParser > vs. > LO_URE_CTOR_FUN_com_dot_sun_dot_star_dot_comp_dot_extensions_dot_xml_dot_sax_dot_FastParser
Oh - it's not a typo. We use service name in codemaker/source/cppumaker/cpputype.cxx - Do we know also implementation names in codemaker for services? -- Matus _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
