On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yosh...@collabora.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> wrote: >> > >> > That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's >> > too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't >> > remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the >> > cell and tabbed away. The AutoCorrupt kicked in. And <ctrl-z> reversed >> > the ENTIRE operation, deleting the text I'd typed! I just *could* *not* >> > work out how to get LO to accept what I'd typed without insisting on >> > corrupting it. >> > >> > So it makes a lot of sense, in many circumstances, for a user's input to >> > be treated as multiple steps requiring multiple undos, even when it's >> > just one user action that triggers it. >> >> This. >> Please check out bug #36867 which I filed 3 years ago and still isn't fixed. > > Just so you know, piggybacking on a thread and say "please fix my > favorite bug I filed x years ago" is not appreciated.
Sorry if I offended you. Reading about "AutoCorrupt" as written by Wols reminded me of this bug as it is about the very same subject: the lack of separate undo for multiple steps (user input + autocorrection). It's also not my favorite bug; I actually don't really care much about it anymore since I it hasn't affected me in a long time. But maybe there are other users like Wols who are still running into this. The bug just seemed relevant to what Wols said, that's why I mentioned it here. Regards, Kevin _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice