Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote > Times are: > 500 | 3:20 > 750 | 8:10 > 1000 | 17:15 > 1500 | 56:50 > 1750 | 92:20
Hi! Back in the days (LO 3.5.6) we had the same problem using the xls file as data source. It took xx minutes every time to get few docs generated from the list. All ended when instead of using Wizard directly we used File>Print approach. Generating few files was pretty much instant and the interface is better to use by our users than the Wizard (select records, save to file, select naming etc.). I checked your files from the bug and on my slow disk laptop writing directly to separate odt files per each record took (using 4.3.0RC1): - 500 files - ~3:00 - 1000 - ~10:00 - 1500 - ~17:00 and so on... All this is at constant 1000 files in 10 minutes ratio. System is responsive, LO only at 20% of CPU (i5). Speed is 2 files per second, but I have low disk write speed. Unfortunately counter tends to got stuck sometimes (you have to move the windows few times). Selecting direct printing took: - 1000 records - 4:00 and so on... All this is at constant 1000 records in 4 minutes ratio. Speed is x(x) records per second. Luckily we discovered this method before former Office users demanded to be back with Microsoft instead of LibreOffice. As they wanted to print only few files per batch, we saved the day. No complaints since then... All in all - still slow if you generate xxx(x) records/files, but definitely faster that the Wizard. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4115215p4115312.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice