Robert Martinez <m...@mray.de> writes: > I think we can first link so something pretty easy to digest, similar > to how CC does it: > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ (or maybe even more reduced) > and go into more detail via another link. >
There seems to be much disagreement about the effectiveness of the "human readable deed" approach. I would suggest for the first iteration of this, use the existing Free Software Definition page (possibly after making a few improvements to the introduction). This is analogous to other labeling programs to me. Labeling criteria are often very specific and detailed; I think ours would actually be quite simple compared to many that are out there (for animal testing, eco-friendly, and so on). > I propose to stick to a label without typography, so we avoid > multilingual issues and can offer a label that works on in an size on > any background. > I think words might be necessary, but they could be in a tooltip rather than the label image. -john -- John Sullivan | Executive Director, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: 61A0963B | http://identi.ca/johnsu01 | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at <http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=8096>.