It does purposefully contain programming language implementations
though. For instance, the A+ language entry on that page doesn't even
contain information on what language it's implemented in, which
suggests that it was tagged with the
"Software-development:programming-language" solely to indicate that A+
is a free programming language implementation. I checked my
interpretation with the Guile and mit-scheme pages, both of which are
tagget with "Software-development:programming-language" and
"Programming-language:scheme" even though they are not primarily
implemented in Scheme.
Is the FSD misusing those categories? Ambiguity kinda defeats the
purpose of a semantic wiki.
Le mer. 3 févr. 2016 à 21:59, Herbert Beadle <beadl...@clarkson.edu>
a écrit :
> Now augment that GNU list with all relevant free software
programming language implementations:
> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Category/Programming-language
That category in the wiki isn't supposed to be for implementations of
languages, it's supposed to be for sorting everything by what
language it was implemented in. For instance, the first result on
that page, 0AD, is implemented in C++ and Javascript, so it appears
when you filter by those languages. The page you linked filters by
all languages, so it has everything that has a language listed for it
in the directory.
-Alan Beadle
