On 06/10/2016 07:18 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/10/2016 06:25 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote: >>> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400, >>>> Richard Stallman wrote: >>>>> > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name >>>>> > given to it by its developers. >>>>> >>>>> In this case, you have to choose to give this kind of respect >>>>> either to the developers of Arch GNU/Linux or to the GNU Project. >>>>> Respecting the former means joining them in disrespecting us. >>> >>> It is my propose to solve it: >>> >>> 4. **Parabola and Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)**: >>> We will develop an operating system that is a free >>> version of the GNU/Linux system from "Arch" project >>> and possibly other Arch-based systems. ... >> >> s|propose|proposal| > > Even in my proposal we should use 'Arch GNU/Linux' or 'Arch (the > GNU/Linux distribution)' as the former Arch operating system name in > Parabola project, not just our Social Contract. > > 'Arch Linux' is a misnomer, because the system is GNU/Linux and > Nomenclature page [0] needs expansion to explain that we will use the > correct name 'Arch GNU/Linux' or 'Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)' > because we are giving this kind of respect to the GNU Project. > > In FSDG [1], specifically in "Please Avoid Repeating Propaganda and > Confusion" says about list of words to avoid, in that list explains > about Linux system as word to avoid [2] > > Parabola is a endorsed distro by FSF and it should avoid propaganda and > confusion, even if Parabola talks about another distros (eg. Arch, > Ubuntu, Suse, etc) inside the project. > > [0]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Nomenclature#Arch > [1]:https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html > [2]:https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
+1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
