On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote: > On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: >> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even >> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be >> easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need >> to make everyone mad at each other. > > It's not just about terminology. It's about deliberately misinforming > the people to back your project because it's been libre hardware and > libre software "right from the beginning". And also misinforming people > to think it's OK for their freedom to buy laptops with proprietary BIOS > rather than with Libreboot.
Richard Stallman has just confirmed me that FSF has not received the PCB design sources along with the Libre Tea Computer Card. I hope that now everyone understands that this EOMA68 board is *not* libre hardware as claimed. Tiberiu
