> in fact, both licenses have to contain such an explicit concession to > each other for the one-way compatibility to work. >
This bit isn't correct. It's perfectly feasible for a license to say it is one-directionally compatible (i.e. explicitly allow relicensing or use in a project of a particular license) without the other license saying anything about it. I can write a new copyleft license today that is explicitly one-directionally compatible with the AGPLv3, and no change to AGPLv3 is needed for that to work. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
