On 08/31/2017 12:43 PM, John Sullivan wrote: > Aaron Wolf <wolft...@riseup.net> writes: > >> Thanks. But damnit. Sounds like the AGPL has an unfortunate flaw here. >> Is there not even a requirement that people get any notice that the >> software being run is under AGPL at all, unless it's modified?? > > Put a source link in the code. Then if anyone removes it in the version > they are offering over the network, it's a modified version. AFAICT, > most AGPL programs have such notices (not sure why you wouldn't). > > -john >
Yes, of course. And you mean explicitly *a user-facing source-link in the UI* (a link in just the source code is no good if you don't have the source code). But this still means that we can have this bad (though unlikely) situation: 1. Service A goes up with code under AGPL 2. Service B goes up with unmodified code 3. Source host goes down 4. Service B remains running indefinitely with no source available, and service B can refuse to provide it In fact, a single _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
