"[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes: > Again I still can't understand as to why purism gets so much air time > on the FSF website and the tech news media yet legitimately libre > hardware gets none.
> "PureOS" is simply a debian clone used to peddle non-free laptops and > now purism has obtained an implied endorsement from the FSF. That is not an accurate description. PureOS is an endorsed distribution because it has committed to upholding the Guidelines for Free System Distribution. It made a number of important changes from Debian in order to achieve that. All or almost all of the currently endorsed distributions are based on other nonendorsed distributions -- but the changes they make are significant for user freedom. >> I apologize to Todd and the Purism crew, and to everyone for the >> confusion. I'm sorry. > Was it really the fault of the FSF? Yes. -john -- John Sullivan | Executive Director, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: A462 6CBA FF37 6039 D2D7 5544 97BA 9CE7 61A0 963B https://status.fsf.org/johns | https://fsf.org/blogs/RSS Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at <https://my.fsf.org/join>. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
