Thank you Aaron. On 09/04/2021 23:08, Aaron Wolf wrote:
In principle, you could use the GPL straight ahead and even AGPL. That would require that anyone who distributes the audio and video would actually include the source files, whatever they might be. This gets weird. Does it mean all the raw files and audio tracks and the saved sessions from editing programs? Maybe. The terms of GPL say that source is the preferred form for making changes. So, whatever form that is for you, that would be the source files for the text, audio, and video.I'm not the first to consider this, and there's something to it. I haven't explored the pros and cons of GFDL for these cases. On 2021-04-09 11:18 a.m., Ali Reza Hayati wrote:Hello guys. Can anybody help me with choosing a license for a blog other than Creative Commons? I want to use GNU FDL 1.3 but I'm not sure if that's fine for audio/video too. Can we use GFDL for audio and video too? If not, what copyleft license do you suggest to use, other than Creative Commons ones? Best. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
-- Ali Reza Hayati (https://alirezahayati.com) Libre culture activist and privacy advocate PGP: 88A5 BDB7 E07C 39D0 8132 6412 DCB8 F138 B865 1771
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss