Thank you Thomas. On 15/04/2021 00:53, Thomas Lord wrote:
The raising of voices in conversation does not have a context independent or culturally universal emotional valence. For some it is normal and expected. For some it borders on a taboo. Taking the complaint about RMS raising his voice at face value: it borders on antisemitism. I don't mean that every Jew communicates in the style of RMS (of course). Perhaps we can step back and think about this complaint in that context. Here is a story that might help: Long ago, in the very early days of the FSF, I was an employee and there was more or less one person handling most of the operational day to day corporate business. One day, I had done something that (understandably) pissed RMS off. You see: after a brief chat with a board member other than RMS, I unilaterally decided to work remotely. I packed up and moved several states away, almost overnight, to be near my sweetheart (who is now my wife - it's a very romantic story, in retrospect). I did not notify RMS I was doing this. It upset him. He called and yelled. I was very distressed by this - I didn't expect it at all. I sought and received consel -- very good consel -- from that woman who was running the day to day business. "Just hang up on him if he gets like that," she advised. Later I understood this could be generalized: walk away, if need be. One can also really productively engage, sometimes, also, just by yelling back if you have something relevant and coherent to say. As an older person now, I realize that part of RMS' reputation comes from him being actually a better and more dynamic conversationalist than most people have ever met -- and yes, that can be hard to come to grip with at first. This doesn't mean that RMS or anyone has free reign to be a constant holy terror, always screaming and yelling, but that is not what I ever saw RMS do and is not what any of the complainers have said he does. Raised voices among friends and allies typify some cultural backgrounds -- including mine, ironically enough. It can, when in those cultural contexts, a bit creepy if someone does not communicate this way. One asks: what is that quiet person hiding from us? Interruption is a similarly culturally variable communication style. In some cultures I mix in, it is expected and is often a sign of engagement with what one is saying - silence comes off as rude / checked out. In other cultures, the opposite -- interruption is not allowed. In a multi-cultural world, we should all be tolerant and flexible in our communication styles. (RMS, meanwhile, is being made to do the limbo by people who think they get to define the One True Civil Converstation Style. Flexibility in style is a two-way street, chums.) None of this means that people making complaints have invalid feelings that should be ignored. Of course not. But it does mean that the particular demands against RMS, and the relentless character assassination, need to stop. Lastly, neither Deb nor any of us is qualified to assess whether or not a single person, RMS in this case, "drives people away from the movement" on balance. That's an incredibly arrogant assertion that centers one own cultural expectations and projects them onto an entire planet of people. Can we end the pointless debate of such assertions once and for all? -t On 2021-04-14 12:28, Deb Nicholson wrote:I can't comment on the censored email that no one saw. > It actually serves the opponents of free software quite well to have > someone who pushes people away and facilitates a hostile > environment, be in charge of the FSF. Quite opposite is true, RMS was never facilitating hostile environment. FSF is not public, but privately founded non-profit, founded by RMS, it is equal as his own, and legally he could, if he would want, keep it totally under his control, but he did not, it is gift to mankind.The FSF is a public charity. It is bound by it's US tax status to servethe public good, not a personal goal although of course there is sometimes overlap. As for a hostile environment, I have witnessed repeated hostility (bullying, ad hominem attacks, dog-piling, etc.) on the GNU mailing lists. I have seen RMS shout at people at least a dozen times inpublic. He inspires others to also interrupt and shout at people in themiddle of their public presentations. Those are hostile acts. You may say they are justified, but they are undeniably hostile. That you come here with this perversion of truth without any facts or evidences is disgrace. I'm not "coming here." I've always been here. I'm a former FSF staff person who built LibrePlanet into a multi-day event and helped set up the LibrePlanet wiki and this list. You calling me a liar is a perfect example of the hostility that I'm telling you pervades the FSF and GNU communities. > Also, RMS is not the free software movement. RMS is the core and heart of the free software movement. > It's dangerous to conflate an individual with a movement. To say > that the "free software movement is being attacked" when what's > actually happening is that a bunch of individuals are calling for > one person to take responsibility for their behavior is a sloppy > generalization. This is just trolling. But censor will like your trolling, as that is why your message pass through. More ad hominem. Ok. > It's disappointing that so many people have chosen to disbelieve > former FSF employees, hundreds of women who have encountered RMS at > conferences or MIT and many, many free software creators. The vast > majority of the people who signed the letter asking for RMS to step > down, care deeply about free software. I wish more of you would try > to consider that. I am also researcher Deb, and I say, if he did something illegal, let those people handle that with him. I have not found anything related to RMS that justifies that type of cyber-bullying online harassment public shaming. Buf if he did not do anything illegal, and somebody complains on his behavior, don't mix that with his capability to lead FSF or speak for free software, it is not related. If free software is a public good and the goal is for more people to use free software, then having a leader who drives people away is at odds with that goal. It's not illegal to poorly mismanage a public charity, but it does break the trust that donors and volunteers have places in the organization and they have a right to speak up about it. Best, Deb Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: [1]https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman [2]https://stallmansupport.org/ [3]https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ References 1. https://www.fsf.org/campaigns 2. https://stallmansupport.org/ 3. https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
-- Ali Reza Hayati (https://alirezahayati.com) Libre culture activist and privacy advocate PGP: 88A5 BDB7 E07C 39D0 8132 6412 DCB8 F138 B865 1771
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss