Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:05:50 +0200
From: Philip Nienhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] OT: 30GB BIOS barrier on Dell Dimension

Matt Hanson wrote:
> 
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Matt Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] OT: 30GB BIOS barrier on Dell Dimension
> 
> Philip Nienhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Date:
> >
> >Matt Hanson wrote:

<snip>
> But guess what...  I connected the 120GB WD HDD to the
> primary plug as master on the primary IDE channel on
> the MB, booted the system with 2 Partition Magic
> floppies, and PM saw the entire 120GB disk!
> Previously I had installed that drive via the PCI
> controller card, and ran PM on it from within WinME
> booted from the 10GB HDD, and then created a 10GB
> FAT32 at the >end< of the 120GB HDD.  That 10GB
> partition was for running Ghost, and creating an image
> of the 10GB saved to that 10GB partition on the 120GB
> HDD as a backup.
> 
> So I went ahead and installed W2000 directly on the
> 120GB HDD via 4 setup floppies after running PM to
> create a 5GB primary NTFS partition at the beginning
> of the drive, and a primary 100GB NTFS partition after
> that that fills up to the 10GB FAT32 partition at the
> end.

Good!
Why have you used PM anyway? 
I think simply running W2K install from the 4 floppies, or from bootable
CD-ROM would have given the same results. FYI: Win2K has quite a good
disk partitioning tool both in setup and while running.
 
> >> But then I was thinking I could repartition the
> 10GB HDD into 2 5GB
> >>partitions, and then use
> >> PowerQuest's BootMagic to boot either OS.  But
> BootMagic has a
> >>warning about enabling boot from an
> >> NTFS partition saying that it may cause data
> corruption on the
> >>existing 10GB HDD.

Another reason to put away PM and leave it to Win2K's disk management /
partition tool.

> >> So I'm considering installing W2K to a >Fat32<
> partition on the 10GB
> >>HDD, and using the 120GB HDD as
> >> an NTFS data drive to take advantage of NTFS
> support for writing >4GB
> >>files.  But then I don't know
> >> if I can get BootMagic to hide the NTFS drive with
> WinME is booted.
> >>Will WinME just ignore the NTFS
> >> formatted HDD, or might leaving it visable cause
> problems for WinME?

You don't need PM for hiding, WinME simply cannot, repeat: cannot see
NTFS partitions, period.

<snip>
> I also notice that my old copy of Norton Ghost doesn't
> run on a W2K NTFS drive, so I can't backup to an image
> file.  Do you know if the newer ones will Philip?  Or
> maybe you or someone else can suggest a freeware
> imaging program that will do the trick.  I'll search
> the archives and net if not.

I'm sorry, I don't know.
 
> Do you think I'll have any problems having set up W2K
> on 2 primary partitions on the 120GB?  I'm guessing it
> shouldn't matter that I didn't choose an logical
> partition.

I think not.
But for all Windows versions, it is essential to have a primary
partition on the primary hard disk to boot from; AFAIK Windows can't
boot from second hard disks. For Win2K this means that its boot loader
must be on a primary partition on a primary hard disk, the rest of its
files can be anywhere.
 
> It's a bit of a puzzlement that the Dell can now see
> the entire 120GB HDD.  But as we've seen in the past,
> like what Raymond experienced, you just never know
> what a bit of experimentation can come up with without
> any obvious explanation.

But there *is* an obvious explanation, and it has been suggested before
in many a post: 
Good partitioning tools like PM and that of Win2K simply bypass the BIOS
when accessing the hard disk.
Same goes for disk overlays etc. 
This implies that also a crippled BIOS like that of your friend's Dell,
or of a Libretto 110 is automagically bypassed.....
 
<snip>
> Si.... bueno!
> 
> Philip

?Philip?



**************************************************************
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

                 -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE-------
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
              --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**************************************************************

Reply via email to