Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 02:54:39 -0800 (PST) From: John Musielewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] echo indigo
yes under linux there are more system resources availible than under any version of windows. the reason is the smaller kernel. they seem to playback the same under both systems though. digital music does not sound that good no matter how you play it back. john --- Matt Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:56:27 -0700 (PDT) > From: Matt Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LIB] echo indigo > > > --- Stefan Katletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Matt Hanson wrote: > > > > > And what the heck are 'ALSA' drivers?? > > > > Advanced Linux Sound Architecture > > http://www.alsa-project.org/ > > Ah... Thanks Stefan. I was getting it confused with > ASIO there. > > But I guess John's post begs the question from me of > whether people have gotten audio/music/mp3s to play > back on a Libretto running Linux that requires less > system resources than Windows 98 or Win2000? > > I experimented with the Mandrake installation Neil > helped put on my 50 a couple of years back. But I > found even with the low demand shell iceman, Windows > 98 was still better at multitasking during audio > playback, and required less system resources to do > so. > > But Linux was well beyond me. I'd be interested in > hearing if anyone else was more successful. > > Matt > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > >
