On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 09:54:25 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Just a typo for the new release. > I don't tihnk it deserves a patch anyway, but just saying :)
Thanks, for checking on this, but I changed the version number in the release-1.0.0 branch. I plan to keep the master branch always at 0.0.0 so it will always be obvious if someone is running a "development" version of the library. > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <[email protected]> > --- > version_info | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/version_info b/version_info > index 7520e4f..c88de08 100644 > --- a/version_info > +++ b/version_info > @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ > # > > # version components > -VERSION_MAJOR=0 > +VERSION_MAJOR=1 > VERSION_MINOR=0 > VERSION_MICRO=0 -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libseccomp-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
