On 6/28/06, John Hurliman <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse Nesbitt wrote:
> Wow, optional id0 field... You could derail LL's whole Hardware Hash
> system by using a proxy that scrubs that field.
> I suppose it'll be made required soon, yes?
>
It's a hash. If it was made required, the same proxy could just generate
random new hashes for id0 each login. There's no easy way around this,
but fortunately I don't think there is a large crossover of people who
know how to write the login proxy and people who are getting banned from
SL under multiple account names.
John
_______________________________________________
libsecondlife-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/libsecondlife-dev
--
--Jesse
_______________________________________________ libsecondlife-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/libsecondlife-dev
