Nevertheless, I tried with localhost as well as another machine from same network(no heavy IO,memory operations on both machine. so guessing, it would be low latency) . still I get 2000 bytes
Thanks Nitin On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Nitin Deokate <[email protected]> wrote: > Any idea how to get those numbers? > > -Nitin > > > > *> I tried with 500000 bytes to almost 10MB as buffer size, what I get is > 2000 * > *> bytes in each case. You could also try, if you are developer for the > same * > *> feature. * > > I implemented that feature. I've tried it a lot. I don't know why you > don't > get more. What's the latency/RTT to the server from your client? > > -- > > / daniel.haxx.se > > > > > > *From:* Nitin Deokate [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:42 AM > *To:* libssh2 development > *Subject:* Questions about libssh2_sftp_read() > > > > I tried with 500000 bytes to almost 10MB as buffer size, what I get is > 2000 bytes in each case. > You could also try, if you are developer for the same feature. > > Thanks > Nitin > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Daniel Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Nitin Deokate wrote: > > > >> I have modified the *char* mem[1024]; to *char* mem[2500]; > > > > But what if you make it 100000 or 500000 bytes big instead? > > > >> But last response from Daniel says that I should get bigger chunks in > subsequent call, which is not happening. Do I need to change something to > >> get me bigger chunks. > > > > I think 2500 is just too small buffer to get much data with. > > -- > > > > / daniel.haxx.se > > _______________________________________________ > > libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel >
_______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
