On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Kamil Dudka wrote:
If git.libssh2.org is intended to be a mirror of the upstream git repo at
github, it should only contain commits already pushed to github and nothing
else. Additionally, already pushed commits should not be rewritten.
If git.libssh2.org is intended to be a staging repository for your work, it
should be clearly marked such (e.g. by using a separate branch for that
while keeping the master branch synced with github).
I agree completely. As it is now, saying we merge new code into thay git repo
will probably make some people think it was merged into our master repo, which
it isn't.
What about renaming it to a name that makes it sound less official and more
like a staging/experimental git repo?
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
