Hi Peter! Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > | Okay to commit to HEAD and branch-2-0? > | > | If yes, I'll backport to branch-1-5 and post as a separate patch. > | > > Looks like it may work, seems ugly, but yes, please apply.
Okay, thanks! It appears to be doing the right thing here, certainly.
If by ugly, you are referring to 2 forked tars per file copy, I did
it this way to minimise code churn on branch-2-0. I agree that it
would be sensible to rewrite the func_copy_* functions to collect a
filtered list of filenames, and then copy them all in on serial operation
(with 2 forked tars overall). I'll add that to TODO on HEAD.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
