On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:38:58PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 2, 2005, "Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am going to stand up again (because I like being shot down) and ask > > if the "stand alone utility" bit is really necessary. > > I wish it would just go away, or be properly implemented. I see so > many people being bitten by this that every now and then I think we > should just remove it and stop giving people the impression that it's > expected to work. Which is not to say that nobody would be able to > take the libtool script generated during libtool build and install > that, it's just that I'd rather no longer install it by default. > > Until we get as far as implementing something that enables us to use > the pre-installed libtool properly, which implies doing configuration > on-the-fly, recognizing ABI-changing flags and all such tricky stuff, > and possibly generating config bits in the current directory/.libs or > so.
I agree! -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
