Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I have applied that one.
Okay, thanks.
Ah, okay. We just need to move the _LT_SET_OPTIONS up the expansion stack. If it didn't take arguments we could just AC_REQUIRE awrapper,Isn't that what the optional second argument to AC_REQUIRE could be used for? It's not documented, but if Stepan recommends it..? (I have asked on the autoconf list about it).
Hmm... okay. I hadn't noticed that nuance before.
See proposed patch at end.
Looks reasonable, however, one or both of the requiring and required macro will need to be m4_defun to get the m4_provide machinery (I forget
which, sorry).
Wasn't there a requirement to get m4-2.0 out soon? ;-)
Yes, but libtool-2.0 needs to be out sooner! :-p
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_INIT): m4_require.. * libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4 (_LT_SET_OPTIONS): this, with macro parameters.
Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature