Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:21:40PM CEST: > Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | lt_dlcaller_register takes zero args in branch-1-5, 2 in HEAD.
> > Looked at this (as it is a showstopper) and agree. Added api (perhaps > > lt_dlcaller_set_iface(const char*,lt_dlhandle_interface *); or > > something) to > > set the info and remove the arguments here. > > > > Gary? > > So, I think the real problem is that LT_WITH_LTDL from libtool-2.0 will > need to check for a libltdl that provides the lt_dlhandle_first function > to make sure libtool-2.0 using apps get the libtool-2.0 version of > libltdl... Yes, this is an issue we cannot ignore for the release. > And that falls in the remit of the LT_WITH_LTDL rewrite I'm working on > at the moment. Gah! :o) Yep. If it is too invasive to get LTDL_INIT user-exportable and user-usable at the moment, I may even be convinced to offer the new non-subpackage feature post 2.0 only (maybe in a followup minor release even). I know Bob will hate me for this, :) but 2.0 is needed badly for a number of other features as well, which IMVHO seem to work now. I'm open to arguments, surely this is an area where we should reach consensus. If LT_WITH_LTDL worked nicely, I'd be happy enough. :) Cheers, Ralf
