Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:36:00AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Please also apply the then-freed part of your patch queue, > > Before 277, I have (see my patch queue status mail from last Tue):
Gah, I've been unaware of the fact that your patch queue mail *is* sorted. D'oh. > - patches/302-gary-libtoolize-config.diff > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-10/msg00115.html > review pending Will do next. > >that should 284, 285, 286 I believe; > > After 302 is cleared to apply, that will unblock 277, 284 and 285. > 286 will then still be blocked by: > > + patches/303-gary-correct-included-file-matching-expression.diff > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-10/msg00147.html > review pending OK, that one was my "next" before you wrote this, thinking it could come right after 285. > I might be able to apply the patches out of order, but I don't trust > myself to do a careful enough interdependency analysis -- plus I > already did extensive testing in the order they are queued, and it > seems like unnecessary additional work to retest everything after > twiddling the order when we need them all to go in to fix outstanding > known bugs in HEAD anyway. Hope that isn't too much of a pain for > you... No, that's fine. I just need a week to address a few issues after your queue is flushed. Cheers, Ralf