Hi Kean, * Kean Johnston wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:07:21AM CET: > > Handle older SCO systems correctly.
Hmm. The original bug report (that added the sco3.2v5 line) is here: http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=298 I don't quite understand it, though. What exactly is going wrong here? Cheers, Ralf > 2005-10-24 Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * ltmain.in: Update SCO system support. > > Index: ltmain.in > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/Attic/ltmain.in,v > retrieving revision 1.334.2.91 > diff -u -3 -p -r1.334.2.91 ltmain.in > --- ltmain.in 18 Oct 2005 07:26:05 -0000 1.334.2.91 > +++ ltmain.in 30 Oct 2005 21:22:25 -0000 > @@ -2559,7 +2569,11 @@ EOF > if test "$hardcode_direct" = no; then > add="$dir/$linklib" > case $host in > - *-*-sco3.2v5* ) add_dir="-L$dir" ;; > + *-*-sco3.2v5.0.[024]*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;; > + *-*-sysv4*uw2*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;; > + *-*-sysv5OpenUNIX* | \ > + *-*-sysv5UnixWare7.[01].[10]* | \ > + *-*-unixware7*) add_dir="-L$dir" ;; > *-*-darwin* ) > # if the lib is a module then we can not link against > # it, someone is ignoring the new warnings I added