Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:39:27PM CET:Argh! I seem to have posted an in development version of this patch somehow, sorry. Here is the real patch. If you had weird non-repeatable results in tests, and corrupted libltdl/Makefile.am before, this version doesn't have that problem.Good.Okay to commit this version?No. With this, in any of the three subproject/(non)recursive modes, one of Makefile.{am,inc} will end up with a newer time stamp (and Makefile.in won't match Makefile.am's contents).
Oops. Yes, nice catch. I'm fast running out of brown paper bags... Okay, I need to completely rethink how to do this. Unfortunately, I'm flat out with other work until 3rd week of December now, so I may not get to it until then :-( Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature