Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:11:46PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST: > > > >>The following patch addresses > >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I > >>added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if > >>hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This > >>impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX.
> >This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi). > > I'll commit one presently. Thanks. It would be great if you could explain that "static library dependency" does _not_ have to do with static libraries at all -- what a confusing name IMHO! Maybe we should think of a better one. Is that what HP-UX is using in their documentation? > >I'm not sure whether it should be backported, probably not. > > Looks like a new feature to me... no backport rqd imho. Fine with me. Cheers, Ralf
