Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:49:26PM CET: >> The dynamic linker checks are called for every tag, but produce no >> tagged variables. I was going to propose something like the attached >> patch at some point, but thought it best to wait 'til after 2.x is >> released in case it broke something.... maybe should not have waited. > > How about if you apply the bit of your patch for _LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG > only? That seems far safer, and in fact ok to me before 2.2, assuming > no testsuite regressions.
Ok, I applied this. Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com
2008-02-20 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG): Do not call the _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER macro here. Reported by Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/libtool/libtool/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4,v retrieving revision 1.136 diff -u -r1.136 libtool.m4 --- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 16 Feb 2008 03:46:06 -0000 1.136 +++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 20 Feb 2008 18:22:11 -0000 @@ -6832,7 +6832,6 @@ _LT_COMPILER_C_O($1) _LT_COMPILER_FILE_LOCKS($1) _LT_LINKER_SHLIBS($1) - _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER($1) _LT_LINKER_HARDCODE_LIBPATH($1) _LT_CONFIG($1)
