Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:10:30AM CET: > On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> 2) Can we create a branch-2-2 and cherry-pick bugfixes from HEAD >> into it, aiming for a soonish 2.2.2 (let's say, in a few weeks; >> already a few important issues are known)? > > Is CVS HEAD already the recipient of destabilising patches? I had > anticipated applying fixes on CVS HEAD for a while and then branching to > save time moving patches between branches during the interim...
Good thinking. All patches so far should strictly be bug fixes. > If all the patches that went in so far are fixes, then let's wait until > the last possible moment before branching, and save on the number of > simultaneous branches we have to maintain. It's true that maintaining branches is much easier with git, as long as the trees are similar enough that cherry-picking between them works well. > We already discovered that maintaining branch-1-5, branch-2-0 and HEAD > was too much work. I think we should mothball branch-1-5 now, and apply > everything to CVS HEAD until such times as a destabilising patch forces > us to create branch-2-2. Fine with me. > I think we should wait until we are reasonably sure that we won't need a > maintenance release for several weeks before cutting over to git. 2.2.2 > in a few weeks is a worthy goal (2.1b and 2.2 were on the first of the > month, so April 1st seems like a good target), so lets use our resources > to make that happen before worrying about git. That's a plan! Cheers, Ralf
