> > Hi Ralf, > > Ralf Wildenhues skrev: > > Hi Peter, > > <snip> > > So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to: > if test "$GCC" != yes; then > reload_cmds=false > fi > > Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet, but I still hope, that ralf comes to looking into my patch some day.... > > > I'm thinking of two problem cases: > > - could be someone would like to use cccl with GNU binutils ld I guess neither cccl nor parity will work with GNU ld right now, BUT: M$ own cc and cc89 scripts (which are used by M$ to build nearly the whole system with MSVC as backend) use GNU ld, maybe those aren't too important, since not many people except M$ use it, but still ... > > I have wasted quite a bit of time trying to make cccl work. Can someone > pleasepleaseprettypleasewithsugerontop point me to the *exact* cccl > script I should use, what environment I should have and how I should > configure to make it work? Use parity instead :) Cheers, Markus > > > - could be another non-GCC compiler (we've had reports about > > those on w32 before, I don't remember whether that was Portland or > so) > > > > > > FWIW, did you know that 'w32' to me just means "Windows, 32bit"? ;-) > > Err, yes, what makes you make that statement? The same goes for me, but > cygwin is also w32 but most of the time you are best off if you forget > that when you are using cygwin, and that's one of the reasons the name > w32 is not all that useful. When I'm aware of what I'm doing I try to > hold back any use of w32, it's generally too unspecific. Any time I see > w32, I think: "Ok, what is not included this time?" > > > Cheers, > > Ralf > > > > PS: I'm aware of other loose ends in this thread. I'll get to them > > eventually, hopefully. ;-) Feel free to ping me if I haven't by the > > end of next (not this) weekend. > > I will, thanks in advance! > > Cheers, > Peter >