Duft Markus wrote: >>> Patches that do more good than harm are likely to be accepted. >> That's exactly the point i'm unsure about, if I do more harm than good >> or the other way round :) of course, for _me_ I do more good, but does >> it harm others that the hardcode test fails now?
Sorry, don't know how I missed that patch, still, it strikes me as more of a hack than a solution (and what is with the commented case statements being added to ltmain.m4sh?). I'm not even sure how much +s is relevant here, you are changing the hardcode_minus_L to no, surely that is having the largest effect on your DESTDIR installs, not the +s changes? This patch is not acceptable as is, sorry. By the way, do you see DESTDIR installs failing for every package on hppa-hp-hpux systems? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com
