Hi! As reported by Roumen Petrov [1], the cwrapper test is somewhat disfunctional.
Ok to push the attached? Cheers, Peter [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00201.html 2009-01-29 Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> Make modified libtool script in cwrapper test executable * tests/cwrapper.at: Make modified libtool script executable. Report by Roumen Petrov.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index e823ff7..f7fd4d1 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2009-01-29 Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> + + Make modified libtool script in cwrapper test executable + * tests/cwrapper.at: Make modified libtool script executable. + Report by Roumen Petrov. + 2009-01-28 Akim Demaille <demai...@gostai.com> Clean space uses. diff --git a/tests/cwrapper.at b/tests/cwrapper.at index ce4572e..42f8d0f 100644 --- a/tests/cwrapper.at +++ b/tests/cwrapper.at @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ orig_LIBTOOL=$LIBTOOL for restrictive_flags in '-Wall -Werror' '-std=c89 -Wall -Werror' '-std=c99 -Wall -Werror'; do CFLAGS="$orig_CFLAGS $restrictive_flags" sed "s/LTCFLAGS=.*/&' $restrictive_flags'/" < "$orig_LIBTOOL" > ./libtool + chmod +x libtool LIBTOOL=./libtool # make sure $restrictive_flags do not cause a failure