* Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:57:52PM CEST: > Den 2009-09-06 11:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > >* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST: > >>If the test is going to be good enough on w32 I don't know. For gcc > >>it should behave just as on any unix, so what's left is my msvc branch > >>where -Wl, isn't supported ATM so I really can't say if the test has > >>to be tweaked when/if I add that. > > > >Does the branch just pass through -Wl,-foo then, as -foo, or does it > >just drop the flag? > > -Wl, is simply stripped for msvc in the branch (wl=""). That's not right > of course. I think collecting the linker options and feeding them via > a response file is the way to go. -L options are currently fed with the > LINK environment variable, but that could perhaps also be reworked to > use the same response file...
Well, the test will probably need to be fixed for response files or environment variables then. Cheers, Ralf
