Charles Wilson wrote: > This one, I think is OK for pre-2.2.8 -- what do you guys think? > OK to push?
I forgot: the mingw libtool distribution includes this patch, but with the following small change. Obviously I'd merge these two together and commit as one. -- Chuck
diff -u a/tests/cwrapper.at b/tests/cwrapper.at --- a/tests/cwrapper.at 2009-07-12 20:32:35.000000000 -0400 +++ b/tests/cwrapper.at 2009-07-13 04:42:49.391000000 -0400 @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ [], [ignore], [ignore]) LT_AT_EXEC_CHECK([./usea], [0], [ignore], [stderr], [--lt-debug]) LT_AT_UNIFY_NL([stderr]) -AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: \./usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore]) +AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: .*[[\\/]]usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore]) # Make sure wrapper debugging works, when activated at compile time. @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ [], [ignore], [ignore]) LT_AT_EXEC_CHECK([./usea], [0], [ignore], [stderr], []) LT_AT_UNIFY_NL([stderr]) - AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: \./usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore]) + AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: .*[[\\/]]usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore]) done