[ let's drop automake@ ] Hi Paolo,
* bonz...@gnu.org wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:16:59AM CET: > Here is where I was at. After that it was not immediate how to > use a tag-dependent cache variable. Strictly speaking however > using a cache variable is not needed to make the PIC test > overridable. > > The patch is quite risky though. I'm kind of thinking the same. Why not let the PIC setting code just do its work and afterwards check a cache variable for a possible override? That wouldn't require reorganizing the code at all. A reorganization could be useful for other, independent reason (such as factorizing the code for reuse by the lib-link module, for example), but for now, I don't see that this is necessary. Thanks, Ralf (who'd probably only get to it after the holidays)
