On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:58, ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de said: > Thanks for the report and patch. I've just committed another patch that > should make yours unneeded, or so I at least hope: > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/9680/focus=9719> > If there are issues remaining, please report them.
I need to test that; may take a few days. > If I remember correctly, then using pass_all was not preferred by the > contributors of the w32 support in Libtool, or the Libtool maintainers > at that time, and I don't think mingw32ce/cegcc should not be treated > differently from mingw in this respect. I don't care too much about it. WindowsCE is not even ISO-C89 compliant (e.g. errno is missing). There a quite a couple of problems which will hinder development on that platform; a simple example is that it is heavily thread based but stdio does not use any locking. Thus I would feel okay to have just a limited support. Thanks, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.