On 7/18/2010 12:45 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > better. I.e. after Chuck has gotten his path conversion code in > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-06/msg00030.html > accepted and I have augmented it with a couple of extra bits, or fixed
Ah. I was planning to work on adding a test for the previous issue, before doing that. But, if you'd rather, I'll forge ahead with the path conversion stuff first... -- Chuck
