Good afternoon Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:29:01AM CEST: > On 28 Aug 2010, at 15:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > OK to apply to the sysroot branch and merge? > > I'm not sure if I need to ask, so I'll leave a bit of time for comments. > > I'm assuming that the ChangeLog entries map to the actual changes?
Erm. (goes back to look again ...) Yes, I would say so. :-) > How come the ChangeLogs weren't committed at the time of the changes > that they log? Oh, I think that was because at the start of the branch it wasn't clear whether it might see a big rebasing or patch collapsing anyway so authors wanted to not expend possibly extra time. Or something like that. > But sure... we don't want changes in the tree without corresponding > ChangeLog entries after all, so please go ahead. Done. And merged the sysroot branch to master. > Actually, I have a patch series that moves to git-version-gen, but > it's fiddly enough that we should wait until after the next release > before merging. But, at least that means we don't have to worry > about TIMESTAMPS being screwy for too long between the next release > and merging that patch series :-) That's great! Thanks, Ralf