Hi Peter, On 22 Sep 2010, at 15:15, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-09-22 10:11 skrev Gary V. Vaughan: >> Hi Peter, >> >> On 22 Sep 2010, at 15:02, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> This is fixing a testsuite issue for MSVC, and I don't need it >>> to go in before the release. So, no rush. >>> >>> The patch was previously discussed here: >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2008-08/msg00051.html >>> >>> and it is on the pr-msvc-support branch as commit >>> fbc144008bd66848111fb8ef2d7293b33957ea1a (even though that commit >>> happened by mistake and was one of the very unpolished ones). >>> >>> Ok to push after the 2.4 release? (or before if Gary is ok with that) >>> >>> (with this patch and the other one making need_lib_prefix.at skip, >>> there are no more fails for MSVC/MSYS. Boggle!) >> >> Sure, go ahead. And please add a `no test failures with msvc/msys' >> entry to NEWS while you're there. > > I assume you mean that both patches are OK to push then?
Both patches? I saw only the one attached to the mail I replied to. That one is fine to push, yes. What's the other one? Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org)
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part