On 9/24/2010 8:06 PM, Roumen Petrov wrote: > > I would like to propose different macros for export/import of variables > in format: > > #define XXX(type) decorator_before type decorator_after
Why? Peter's formula is practically universal in most packages I have seen (ncurses is the only exception that springs to mind). What advantage does using an "unusual" decorator structure bring? It's not as if we're going to, in our demo/test code, start using __stdcall decorator_afters, are we? (Remember that we're only talking about how the test code is structured, not how libtool "requires" client code to be written. Clients would still be free if they chose to, to use XXX(type) macros). -- Chuck
