[snipped loads of stuff] On 2012-10-02 16:54, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > The new branch gary/reredo-test-operand-order (notice the double re) has > everything broken down into digestible chunks. All the differences between > that and master now look like improvements upon the original hand rolled > version made by my recent scripted revisions, or else outright errors in > the original corrected by the script. All the errors you flagged on the > list are corrected, as well as several others.
That last bit makes me curious :-) > Assuming my running 'make dist' doesn't have any regressions compared to > master, and unless you have additional problems with Windows using the > gary/reredo-test-operand-order branch, I plan to merge the differences > back into master in a day or two. You're saying that you are about to: $ git checkout master $ git merge --strategy=recursive -X theirs gary/reredo-test-operand-order \ -m 'bla bla bla' right? Is that better than committing the diff between reredo-... and master as a revert-light? Why else would you have gone through all the trouble of making all the smaller commits in the first place? I just fired up a test suite run... Cheers, Peter [who is not as alert as he used to when reading diffs]
