On 2024-08-15 13:51, Sam James wrote: > I'm not really seeing any sort of justification for doing this other > than "duplicate output maybe being annoying", but the duplicate output > isn't even assured, and it appears based on a misnomer anyway.
Please keep in mind that some compilers (*cough*Microsoft*cough*) are incredibly verbose even when there are no warnings or errors whatsoever. Cheers, Nick
