On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord > or something? I prefer `something' :-) How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_struct lt_dlhandle'? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
- Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson
- RE: Problem with ltdl.h Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Alexandre Oliva
- RE: Problem with ltdl.h Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Problem with ltdl.h Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: Problem with ltdl.h Kevin Atkinson