Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

[Gary V . Vaughan]

Hi Bruce,

This is how I envision the logistics of integrating your branch to avoid CVS 
merge hell:

        * Finish the MLB->HEAD merge.
        * Flush the patch queue (for HEAD and branch-1-4)
        * Release libtool-1.4.1 (libtool-1.4-p1?) from branch-1-4
        * Release 1.5b from HEAD, and create branch-1-5
        * integrate your patch into HEAD (now 1.6a)

This relies on the MLB merge going well, and assumes that MLB is in good 
enough shape that only a few monthly betas will be needed before 1.5 is a 
resonable prospect.  I still haven't had time to play with MLB, but it seems 
to be widely used and probably is fairly stable by now, I guess.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/

_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool