On May 17, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we get around these problems easier in the binary-branch?
I'm not sure it's going to be easier, but it's hopefully going to be
far more efficient :-)
> I envision a binary libtool that could do all of the processing
> itself, without needing to use sed or shell until it needed to
> call a compiler.
Yep.
> Since users can use GNU sed on the two affected platforms, there's a
> simple workaround, and that leads me to a more protracted but more
> complete solution to the problem.
Agreed. In fact, that's the only way out for the moment. I wish we
could at least warn the users about the problem, though. That would
be better than simply failing.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
