On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Boehne, Robert wrote: > The only thing that troubles me about the link line Bob posted is > that a .dll is specified in the link, not the corresponding .lib. > I'm not a Windows guru, but I thought that you never link to a > dll directly, but to the .lib that is created when the dll is.
This, of course, is possible via the wonders of libtool. Libtool should hide the fact that a .lib or .a (or whatever) is actually used under the covers. In fact, Microsoft compilers, Cygwin, and MinGW appear to use different naming schemes for these link libraries. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
