On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:56:47PM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote: > [snip snip] > > For this feature to really be useful a library would have to be > a) Initially developed on OS/X > b) dependent on two level namespace > c) not really useful on any other plaform (no reason to > fix for a flat namespace) > I don't think there are too many libraries that would fit this > criteria, but please, correct me if I'm wrong. > > In short, I'm not dead set against the idea, I just don't see the point.
I have no clue when it comes to OSX. However, the only reason I support this is the impression I get that two-level namespaces are good for OSX. Is this true? Does Apple *recommend* flat or two-level namespaces? -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
