On 26.09.2003 02:44:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Bernhard Rumpler wrote: >>>When I try to link static libraries, then a warning "Linking the shared >>>library libgtkhtml-2.la against a loadable module - libhtmllayouthtml.a is >>>not portable!" is displayed. What does "not portable" mean in this >>>context? >> >> I suspect that this complaint is because the library doesn't have >> versioning information as part of its name. > >This complaint is because libhtmllayouthtml.la was linked with the >-module flag to libtool, which means it is meant to be a dlopenable >module, and on some platforms (Mac OS X/darwin NetBSD/a.out) may not be >used as input to the linker. > >If libhtmllayouthtml.la was not linked with the -module flag, it is a bug.
no, it is not linked with the -module flag. Could the problem be caused by my modifications of the respective ".la"-file, as described in another message of this thread: Bernhard Rumpler wrote: >For now I always have to modify the respective .la files of the >.a files in the subdirectories, to be able to link them. For this >I set library_name (?? is this OK??) to the name of the .a file, >installed=yes and the libdir to the respective .libs directory >containing the .a file. Not a very good solution, and I'm also quite >unsure, if this can cause problems. thanks, Bernhard _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
